Ebenezers' Freethinking Notes

 Arguments Against Existence of God

 Debate + Argument Formulation Tips

 Formation of Moral Goals

 Understanding Confusion      It is clear that the human mind is not always rational. I want to understand what makes this possible in the human mind, what causes these things.     Torture is our ability to comprehend nonsense. Can you speak stupid?

What enables morality? What enables love? What enables trust?  Moral goals would not be pursued if Biology were to work differently. I explain this in  my recent post in pro-choice  by depicting the theoritical chances in pregnancy might make one lead towards allowing abortion for convenience. It is how extreme we take this sense of "convenience" and possibility of rehabilitation. After some pondering, it is clear that the physical nature of this world is what allows for morality yo be pursued, therefore, the reason for morality isn't objectiveness, but rather practicalsim. If you do not understand this, then your brain isn't evolved as Einstein's brain on a physical level. Moral goals are not magic. Morality is enabled and practiced only by those who are able to comprehend it. This is why different animals species don't follow same moral goals as humans do. Moreover, a clear difference can be seen in those who are hyper fixated and obsessed with morality, cue

 In this sense, it makes sense to claim god is real, but at that points, why use a euphemism to describe love and trust, why not just say love and trust? Keywords: god is love, science of love, love is real, moral love, morality is real, state of confusion, dogma, curiosity, justified dogma,