Posts

Showing posts from November, 2021

It's something you feel, not something you speak of or study

 how to cooperate feel God's presence.

When you hurt children, you are hurting scientists

Image
 don't hate what you don't understand, born a genius judge ability to climb a tree live its whole life believing it's stupid according to set criteria. Unfortunately, scientists and intellectuals of the like are not treated welly by society [ 2 ]- history shows that to be loud and clear, as that is the only way to run a successful society- by shunning the intellectuals. See: informalcy and anti-intellectualism. We are all little Einstein's

Informalcy = Anti-Intellectualism

Learning how to learn

 Science is basically the study of learning how to learn Apply your knowledge of learning how to learn- use flashcards, etc. Learning How to Learn: Powerful mental tools to help you master tough subjects

Religion teaches opinions not facts

 Religion teaches opinions not facts Just so we are clear, using factual information to support an opinionated claim/premise does not change the fact that said claim is an opinion - in other words, it's a fact that it's an opinion by applying said criteria (definition) for what an opinion even is - we have yet to identify the limits of human stupidity, human opinions, which is why we can't define what an opinion even is, as being stupid is only a part of the process. Sometimes, I ask myself: Why and how come is learning such things even possible? But I have to consider the longer lasting effects of childhood, learning to die, and that life itself is temporary. Do opinions "bring us alive?" On the contrary, schools, colleges, and universities, teach facts, not opinions. Those who comprehend know, those who can't, do. Is morality what Einstein referred to as measuring human stupidity? And are moral values subjective? The unopinionated are not in society, as soci

Sense of Humor: The ability to comprehend jokes

  Keywords: Only think, nothing is good or bad unless thought so, inside joke, ability to be moral, mental illness, 

The difference between facts theories and laws

Image
 The difference between facts theories and laws Since some people cannot tell the difference between formulating a theory and putting something to practice, here is a lesson on the difference between scientific theories, theories that became facts (settled science), and man-made law. criterion of nature criterion of natural law criterion of man-made law How to Explain the Difference Between Theory, Law, and a Fact In order to answer the question of: "what are you actually learning?" You must first answer the question of "How do you learn?"; For example, how do you learn morals? AKA. Oversimplifying things, using things practically? A: Via dogma. No one in their right mind would choose to stay in a society. Treating your opinion like a factual theory, does not make it a fact. Only facts are subjective, and morality is an opinion therefore, morality is subjective, no matter how you want to change it, it's a set of criteria adopted that does not explain natures'

Scientific Proof that Life is a mistake

  "Science is the study of mistakes" ~ Ebenezer Suresh Think about it, if we apply the scientific method to our daily lives (meaning we think before we do and not vice versa), we can learn from our mistakes, overall, we can identify the mistake is living itself, however, some override this train of thought by calling morality and God as a necessary evil .

Believing in God is a sign of taking metaphors personally

  Yes, I am calling God a metaphor. Yes, I am calling God and Morality a metaphor. Because that is what is as defined in academic terms. This is what people actually learn, because learning is always specific, there is nothing academic about moral theories, as it does not fit the criteria to be a theory, mainly because it answers the wrong question and only proves that morality is peer pressure. It's simple academic English literature, just ask yourself: what are you really learning?

The happiness formula

Image
 The happiness formula Since we are treating all ideas as theories, I have a theory: Misinterpreting fear is what makes people happy. To all of those people who unexpectedly committed suicide, broke our moral trust, only proved one thing: That we keep learning the wrong less; The truth is, being exposed to moral theories at a young age causes a lack of ability to comprehend complex scientific facts. None of those " I was hit by a car and I turned out fine "

Forms of Fear vs. Curiosity

Image
 Fear vs. Curiosity Fear is derived via human body limits being jeopardized. > Fear comes in many shapes and sizes; One of the most recognized forms of fear is actually a fake smile as well, known as happiness; Yes, the only type of happiness is fake happiness, be glad that you can comprehend this.

I'll regret this, but here goes anyways

Image
 Happy later birthday dear me

The fact about facts and facts about opinions

 Fact about facts Upon hearing the term "fact" one must care to ask: Define fact (the definition is a set of criteria applied, and that itself is a fact), and then only will they see the flawed thought processes of their opinions. A fact is determined by observation Fact about opinions [Ignore] Keywords: fact about opinions, fact about facts, organizing opinions, ethos, pathos, logos, learning how to learn, teaching feelings, convincing, metacognition, psychology, sociology, the art of persuasion, formal education, academics, oversimplifying factual contents, common sense, practicalism, practical ideas, idealism, utopianism, moraltiy is a distraction

Teaching your feelings what to do

 Basically, teaching your feelings how to feel about certain things, because life itself is a learning experience, every second you make a decision to learn: Either learned to stay alive or learned to die: Yes, dying can be learned. So take your learning seriously. In laymen's terms: Telling your feelings what to do in the form of actions, since  actions speak louder than words.