The difference between facts theories and laws

 The difference between facts theories and laws

Since some people cannot tell the difference between formulating a theory and putting something to practice, here is a lesson on the difference between scientific theories, theories that became facts (settled science), and man-made law.

criterion of nature

criterion of natural law

criterion of man-made law

How to Explain the Difference Between Theory, Law, and a Fact

In order to answer the question of: "what are you actually learning?" You must first answer the question of "How do you learn?"; For example, how do you learn morals? AKA. Oversimplifying things, using things practically? A: Via dogma.

No one in their right mind would choose to stay in a society.

Treating your opinion like a factual theory, does not make it a fact.

Only facts are subjective, and morality is an opinion therefore, morality is subjective, no matter how you want to change it, it's a set of criteria adopted that does not explain natures' behavior accurately.

Too many people think their opinions are facts: you have no idea how to build an explanation. It takes 2000 years for the theory of evolution to be formulated up.

The good thing about science is that it's true weather or not you believe it and you not believing it is only proving it to be true. Since thinking is an action.