Objectively Defining "Love"

Preface:

    Just like there are objective feeling of feelings - feelings are real you know. This means that there are objective ways to define "love" - by saying that it's different for everyone, they are either misidentifying what an example of love is, or they simply have no boundaries for defining what love even it. By the logic of claiming "it's different for everyone" one can even claim that rape is a form of love under that possibility.

Theories:

• Love is trust. This trust will affect a child longer-term as how a child is treated at home will determine their tolerance level outside of the home. This proves my theory of mastering the basics and routine first before focusing on complicated tasks and intellectual desire development as you can't pursue curiosity on an empty stomach also level of vulnerability.

Provoking Questions:

• Is love a feeling?
• It is a developed feeling of attachment, it can be prevented proactive lack of vulnerability and careful vulnerability.
• There is only one way to preventing those cuddly feelings from developing.
• What should love feel like?
• What boundaries should this feel like? You only know what you feel in childhood, this is why it's important to explore emotional possibilities to learn that better is practically possible.
• What are the limitations of this definition?
• Define what love is - Can rape, torture be classified as love, no, so there are obviously limits on what is considered "love."
• Therefore, there are limitations on how this feeling is developed and I want to identify the formula used to develop this feeling as a machine learning engineer and computational neuroscientist.

Keywords:

Making your feelings make sense, my feelings make me stronger, love, attachment, based on instinctual, categorizing feelings, identifying and descrbing feelings, emotional abuse, believe in mental health, distraction from curiosity,