What enables morality?: Proving Moral Absolutism Wrong

What enables morality?

What enables love? What enables trust? 

Moral goals would not be pursued if Biology were to work differently.

I explain this in my recent post in pro-choice by depicting the theoritical chances in pregnancy might make one lead towards allowing abortion for convenience. It is how extreme we take this sense of "convenience" and possibility of rehabilitation.

After some pondering, it is clear that the physical nature of this world is what allows for morality yo be pursued, therefore, the reason for morality isn't objectiveness, but rather practicalsim. If you do not understand this, then your brain isn't evolved as Einstein's brain on a physical level.

Moral goals are not magic.

Morality is enabled and practiced only by those who are able to comprehend it. This is why different animals species don't follow same moral goals as humans do. Moreover, a clear difference can be seen in those who are hyper fixated and obsessed with morality, cue your average joe, as opposed to intellectuals like Einstein whose brain was too smart (literally, Einstein had an enlarged brain - some may even call him an alien, or a superhuman, or not even a a human being at all; This calls for the question: what makes us human beings? Is it just our trust, assumption?) to be hyper fixed on something so uncurious and mundane.

Morality is only enabled by the components in the human brain and each individual experiences, proving we are limited and controlled by our enviornment, as without the components in our brain, we wouldn't even be able to enable comprehending it.

What enables our behavior is what causes our behavior, as without it, none of said behavior would be able to exist. For example, without amygdala, using fear tactics on a person would be physically impossible given the persons' incomprehensibility of fear.

the brain comprehension level allows morality to sustain, those who are mentally ill cannnot comprehend morality