Variables Used to Calculate Feelings // [formerly known as "how human beings work (simple neuroscience)"

How human beings work: - our attitudes, and biases towards ideas.

These are the variables used to calculate feelings:

Feelings are used to measure how out-of-touch with reality one is, which is what creates feelings over time

Basically, interpretation of what's actually happening vs. what's actually happening, refer situational fallacy and goal oriented manual labor fear.

Source of information matters too; The only true 100% verifiable source is nature in and of itself, so interpret nature, I say this because I simply feel as if nature is truth, refer being alone, meditation.

Refer Interpretation style

State of mind/current mind limits (present state of mind); This is called attitude bias, we all have it when looking at and acknowledging ideas.

    Science thought process vs. substitution for a flawed thought process: basically (refer to post) unbiased mindset vs. biased mindset [refer examples of pragmatic system]

Human nature mind limits bias (this is what makes us all the same, in terms of formulas); This is the nature of the human brain; This is what brings on the feelings nature (ex. happy, sad, mad). This is the feelings limit for most, this is the part where they can't think much after experiencing said feeling. This is what you feel like when you are 3 years old vs. seeing the same thing at 13 years old.

Experience bias towards said idea (same thing as human mind limits [synonymous with threat bias]); For example, spending more time with Dogs because you think you have nothing else to do because you are conditioned and mentally bound by morals from merely thinking anything else or natural aging process.

Level of threat bias, jeopardizing security [via experiencing experiences] (messes up perception with reality and ideal system and creates delusional-indicating feelings)

How the information is being used. Ideally speaking, it's relationship to prefect linguistics world. For example, asking manipulative questions. How the attitude towards an idea is measured and what it implies to other things. Thoughts processes are a euphemism for sensing, they are solely based on things sense/experience.

The truth interpretation logic vs. the way it's interpreted (weather or not it's accurate) creates feelings. For example, being on drugs create feelings known as hallucinations, another example that is quite common in normal civilian life is verbal communication, we practice the thought process of looking out for the variables (thru reputation experience, ofc) of certain sounds via our senses (<- be aware of this fact), cherry-picking facts from our senses to interpret and it just so happens to go along fine, which is why we still use it so far.

How the info is gained vs. it's real interpretation (refer top one, right above this one); What you think it means vs. what it actually means is what you can use to measure feelings.

    Example: How it’s interpreted via verbal language vs how it’s interpret via scientific thought process compare and measure differences in logic applied this what creates the feelings.

[Aka. Situational Fallacy] Thinking about something (an idea, or variables of another event, one that is) other than the situation you're in, means you are delusional, this is used as a measurement to feelings. (refer state of mind limits, human nature mind limits; These are the things that you should be thinking about for calm feelings; Observe surroundings, master this skill, then you'll be calm); Basically, all thoughts should be thought up of according to time, whilst time passes; Events should be classed within reality. For example, if you are currently studying your environment, you are studying how the events change over time.

    For example, if you only consider the fact that someone is coming at you with a knife, that is a form of cherry-picking facts practiced as a survival instinct, this is why rest of the mind only focuses on one part of the surroundings, (and not be curious) rather is filled with the feeling of being scared.

        Note: This is the most common fallacy that is used to manipulate people. This is used to systematically force people to set goals (usually disguised as 'freedom' 'rights'). A common example of this is verbatim communication - a form of communication used by managers to their manual labor employees.

            All ideas/goals (ideas are a form of goal derived) derived are a form of fear practicing thinking in theory, theoretically speaking.

This is called feelings logic; Use criteria, rubric applied to the vague information (refer ideal system thought process), and evaluate it as such.

To "think" is a part of "doing" - we are constantly limited by doing; We must identify these limits, called science. You are only limited by mental perception, what you think is the limit in and of itself; As the quote goes "it only does so as such, only if you think that's the case."

Thinking about what, in what situation (aka. situation fallacy); interpretation of reality vs. actual reality (kind of like what you think you learn vs. what you actually learn) in a certain situation; For example, thinking about food whilst in a classroom means you are delusional because you are not studying the classroom, your very surroundings, rather thinking of an idea that has no relationship to the classroom.

How exactly the 'what' (-> content of the idea) is gained, there are many forms (there are also limits to experience, this is where the variables of experience comes in handy to be used as a consideration within a thought process) [learning logic]; For example, I can gain the information that a family member of mine has died via verbatim vs. me seeing them get ran over by a car, I think it depends on what motivates me to interpret my experiences as such. It must be an imbalance because scientist are balanced. - as you can see these are two different modes of communication. Remember, all things are learned, and most of the time it's the trust and morals' fault for creating such flawed emotions.

Human being limits, mental limits, pragmatic plan formulation limit, ideal linguistics system limits.

Categorize it yourself, don't let anyone practice that thought process for via verbatim communication.

If you really wanted to find out specific experiences, compare your experiences (what you know) to someone else who is perfect to their experience.

Variables used to calculate how human beings work:

The 5 senses, that's literally it.

Common sense for deriving and developing goals in the name of fear-jeopardized survival instinct practiced over time.

These are the components that make up the thought process.

Just consider what "affects" it, what changes what variables, use this formula to see the changes. [refer ideal system, and pragmatic system; These are the two noun variables that are used to calculate the feelings produced and felt by you, the human being]

It's in the air: [insert graph with senses feeling surroundings via 5 senses] also explain pressure and focus state of and add how morals contribute to that via repetition practice..

consider what affects it, scientifically speaking, this is why you only know what you know, and work only the way you think you work; don't assign bigger feelings and be ignorant, measure it accurately because you are unique, thoughts are specific feelings, and no one else has felt this except you because no one else can feel it for you, don't be manipulate by others' ideas.

Feelings Formula

Current Feelings Felt = what facts did you consider, as experienced events are stored in the mind as a feeling, earn from history - be aware of this.

Basically, interpretations vs. reality.

Other Useful Notes:

Everything we do is based off of feelings

Variable ‘x’ substituting ideas same thing as substituting formula, except this time you are identifying the limits of human being capabilities, which are represented in feelings, question how you derive ideas, the time it takes, the factors involved, just be aware of what your body is considering.

I have started this project to be aware of what I have learned, and not to simply subconsciously consider some pieces of  information and emphasize other facts. I am trying to accept the experiences I've experienced to learn from it.

Emphasized facts = assigning a bigger meaning to said facts, it means you are ignorantly of the real reason you are doing so as such, it's because the nature of the environment you were in manipulated your behavior.

we do because we can and it's the only thing we can at that time as time moves constantly, think according to reality

feelings are based on how we perceive certain events

right-wingers clearly don't take mental heath well, that's why we have many mentally ill people and tat's why the dems want to stop the sadistic Republicans. Republicans abuse trust in kids.

the validity of the content learned can be determined based on the way it's learned

we do because we feel the need to.

It's called an attitude

Repetition over time, ideal variable learned via abusing trust and pressuring (ex. cornering to corner to make sure this is the only option they have)

saying words is an example of merely expressing feelings, as the will for living itself an example of expressing feelings.