All about flawed thought processes (basically anti-science mindsets, most people practice this under the name of freedom of speech)

-

 How Flawed thought processes are formed

If it's not a scientific thought process then it's an anti-science thought process learned in one of these ways listed below. Refer for logical fallacies if necessary.

These are all examples of how people learn to interpret and fall victim to interpretation propaganda. Is this the reason why schools don't teach propaganda? Because they use it themselves?

This happens when a person gains the wrong piece of information at the wrong time; For example, a person trusting their friend and practicing the friendly thought process, but their friend insulting them and calling them an idiot not according to plan for continuing future friendship - ideally (-> refer linguistics post) and practically (human limits) plan speaking, don't only consider how the information personally affected you, rather consider the overall plan it affects, as long as you're not physically being killed, you'll be fine.

Don't misunderstand environment.

PRO TIP: If you feel any emotion, it's because you are in a situation where you are a part of the drama taking place, not observing it with goggles as protection like a scientist would learn from it. This is an experiment, not a drama play!

Forms of mental limits - not being aware of the human limits, rather being 'aware' of how to act 'civilly' in society. Artificial mental limits, limits that don't describe reality, it's like looking and seeing the back of a vending machine. An example of this, would be 'morals' and 'respecting' cops.

  • This is like leaving a scar on the body

Ideal variable placeholder variable manipulation - usually occurs via verbatim form of communication; This happens when another variable is created in the head, a fake word (refer fake word list) via a fear-mongering experience (which is the nature of verbatim communication - trust and morals practiced are a form of expressing fear). This is concluded as such in an event after it occurs, it is usually consolidated as something that is okay to be learned, that's why it sticks as a placeholder variable word in the head; An example of this would be stealing, God, social constructed words, socially stigmatized words. These words only exist as a placeholder for feelings inside head. Refer to think means to feel.

  • Common rhetoric to describe this: "What you think you learn vs. what you actually learn." 
  •  This is like using eye-glasses when you don't need them. 
  •  Definition of Social Construct: "It exists because humans agree that it exists." 
    •  "A social construct is something that exists not in reality, but as a result of human interaction for the goal of civil behavior; Basically just misplaced feelings." 
  • Definition of Social Stigma: "A thought process that perceived surroundings to be bad or good derived off of fear"
  • Oversimplification is a variable, a variable many common people used, they are mentally handicapped from learning the truth, they stored their curiosity feeling in a word as such.  They constantly practice the oversimplification fallacy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_the_single_cause
  • Identifying Thought Process is identifying metal process, feelings are the truth thought process, explain them to lead yourself back to the truth, it's like blood on the floor, trace it to lead yourself to the truth. 

Phrase Indoctrination - usually occurs via verbatim form of communication; This happens when another person experienced being talked to goes on a tangent about something completely random (as interpreted), thus abusing trust, and the mental limit of morals that is being practiced; An example of this would be gaslighting.

  • Another example of this is: Learning too fast - this occurs when pressure is indicted by practicing in the abusing of the morals and trust practiced [1][2][3]; The pressure occurs via gaslighting and it messes with the state of mind.
  • Interpreting ads are a form of corporate propaganda gaslighting; Remember, propaganda isn't content, it's the abuse of the interpreting style adopted by human nature (refer how human beings work simple neuroscience). Be aware of this, how you set goals, constantly; Don't be manipulated and practice being ignorant.
  • For example, peer pressure, intrusive ads

Only understanding the 'what' being taught, not understanding the 'how' said thoughts were derived - Verbal communication is designed to keep us practiced into the propaganda interpreting logic, we are basically cutting off our own foot. It is designed to go too fast for interpreting each other accurately, rather only cherry-picking (thought process) facts from surroundings, aka. narrow-minded mindset.

Any form of misplaced feelings - // Preface: Think of feelings as a cage, or like a thermometer, it measures feelings, in the same way of being aware of the fact that thoughts are neurons. [end of preface] // These feelings are what I like to call feeling dumps, they are expressed in the form of hobbies, fighting, etc, all done whilst following morals. Unfortunately, teachers cannot correct the specifics of human behavior because of law limits (ex. freedom of religion) and because they teach too much in too little at a time.

    Miscategorizing feelings, thus implying a new variable being created: abusing state of mind by practicing morals, taking it one step future to cause more fear, and starting the survival coping mechanism instinct (usually learned from repetition at birth when knowing nothing else, this a form of taking advantage of people) the content interpreted is created a new variable called fear and is actively running in said state of mind of said particular event.

Situational fallacy, a form of being truly delusional - instead of studying the situation one is in and deriving thoughts learning from it, they are learning anything else but self-learning rather either learning social constructs and are being fear-mongered, thus, practicing the thought process of learning the 'what' (learning anything but how to study said situation you're currently experiencing) and not the repetition of the experience learning the how it works.

  • For example, interpreting ads are a form of corporate propaganda as it makes you practice being the victim to gaslighting
Learning/experiencing the same thing over and over again - 

Learning the same ideas from the event as you learned before makes a person learn being lazy and completely ideally dependent on someone else, not nature, rather interpreting it as a noun with a bigger feelings attached to it, it requires ignorance.

Opinions develop based off of pressure and ignorance.

In order to calculate these, considering human limits is an important factor to calculating as such.

    Basically, thinking about another event rather than thinking about the real, scientific, physical, pragmatic situation you're in, right now.

After learning from such experiences, you cannot derive 'immoral' thoughts anymore, meaning that you cannot freethink.

Conclusion: Almost all of the flawed thought process mentioned here are learned via experiencing such experiences as mentioned. These are all of the ways all of the 'flawed thought processes' are formed [see below for more details on 'flawed thought processes'].

    All of the above requires explicit focusing [refer below, on how focusing is bad] on one part of the surroundings, learned via threating trust.

    Bad feelings are developed not because of the word/phrase used to demean the person (ex. "you should feel bad"), but because of the subconscious feelings considered, considering the events of the experience, don't focus on cherry-picked facts (like being scared of death solely because you've heard a Christian say that you'll go to hell and suffer more, refer above, that's a form of gaslighting; That's situational fallacy, talking about an unrelated event to the situation you're experiencing right now), interpret the surroundings in a way where you want to learn more about it, not where it threatens trust and imposes a mental limit.

    We practice lazy interpreting (only interpreting parts of experiences, cherry-picking and oversimplifying) thought process as it's a survival instinct.

    Basically, any form of reacting is a form of propaganda thought process. As propaganda isn't content, it's thought process, which is human behavior, be aware of your own behavior.

Examples of flawed thought processes

Flawed thought processes impose mental limits and make one narrow-minded, not open-minded and curious enough to desire to learn more form an unbiased interpretation.

It you interpret its accurately you will know that there is more to know, you will be in such a state of mind.

Note: All of these thought processes are a form of direct interpretation of said event the person has experienced and not actively considering certain variables factors rather only considering and oversimplifying powered by pressure [insert graph]; Refer focusing fallacy (down below) and cherry picking fallacy (down below).

Any form of "focusing" - a euphemism for cherry-picking and acting as if you know everything; the formula for this development is the same as [see any form of opinion]

    Focusing means to focus on a goal, pursing any goals, are a form of manual labor, which are always motivated by fear - we should work to eliminate manual labor, not increase it. The focus quotes are always goal-oriented [1].

Any form of an Opinion - Opinions are a judgmental-type-of thought process, a thought process used to evaluate, usually a particular event (so cherry-picking fallacy - not seeing the plan as a whole, like a scientist would, rather judging individually because of the real reason of fear-mongering interpretation); This thought process is derived as a form of misplaced feelings, as a survival instinct, a coping method for people to express the rest of their feelings. For example, bullies. As a matter of fact, opinions can be considered as a type of mental limit, like morals; As morality is subjective (meaning it's an opinion) and a form of a social construct, it shows that it is indeed a form of a mental human limit.

    Examples of opinions - comparing

    as a survival, a coping method - for example, being the orientation of 'not straight' was deemed ideally unfavorable, because, in order to breed with the result of getting a kid, a female was required, this is why being not straight was looked down upon because they felt as if, in order to survive, they needed a kid.

    Judging it as such is what makes people feel bad - judging events whilst in a different situation [refer situational fallacy]

    [Sociology] We all have different feelings because of moral practicing bias - 

We practice the monkey see, monkey do thought process, this is how we learn, and we constantly gain new information to categorize, specifically. Anything bad you learn, you learn it from someone else.

So, if you want to learn new information (without having any variables that are taking advantage of social constructs)

Note: Judge a person, not by any particular event, but by their lifestyle as a whole, if you are unbiased and curious enough you will care to learn this, according to the formula of human nature. [1] [2] [3]

    The problem is that most people don't practice self-reflection often and get manipulated.

Judging means evaluating an event based on expectations, goal.

Curious means learning based on unbiased, no fear-mongering mindset.

Example of how recalling past events is an example of ideal variable information (most of the time, this is practice subconsciously):

Feel Like You've Been Here Before? It Might Be Déjà Vu ...

    The reason you feel confused as a child is because you are just now gaining information via senses to make a history. Also because you have been fear-mongered, thus adopting the manual labor goal mindset to express feelings dump, gaslighted, and have been propagandized into following the flawed curriculum of learning in life phases.

    How human beings work, formula:

Human nature limits, being aware of this variable; Note: this is not any forms of mental limit:

PRO TIP/Formula for how we work: whatever we do, we always do it because we feel the need because we feel like we need to for survival or a coping mechanism to escape uncomfortable feelings formed and felt [this is a fact about human nature] (it's called a feelings dump, like bullies practice being bullies), not want to, there is no such thing as wanting to, it's a social construct, like a "legal definition" -> legal definitions are supposed to manipulate you, it's intentional.

Either we are spoiled and merely come to the conclusion to just "think" that we need it, like thinking that we need to own some new shoes, (an example of depending on materialistic items), or are begging for food. One is for survival, the other is desiring for materialistic possessions, the rich never desires for food because they have enough in order for them to keep living and escaping the uncomfortable feelings (fact), as a coping mechanism, they desire for new shoes. This is the real reason why one wants new shows, understand people instead of judging them and making fun of them.

We are never delusional to think that we need new shoes even when have enough for theoretical survival purposes, we want it because we want to escape boredom, it's setting a new goal.

We always do what we want/can, we are just manipulated into wanting/doing it as we can only do a limited set go actions over time, and time runs constantly.

Basically, people make you feel uncomfortable stating the truth, which forces you to conform to social norms. [1][2][3]

Any form of social constructs - Social constructs are a form of a mental limit, like morals. We use the wrong words to classify out feelings, these words designed to keep our feelings from falling out of place, like the word 'wrong' - it is assigned a feelings attachment based on the way the information that was gained personally affected the person - it's about the 'how' and 'when' that information was gained via human being senses that assigns the emotional attachment [refer Ideal Variable Placeholder Manipulation]. Social constructs fill a void of insecurity that is usually filled with ignorance being bliss, being happy with others, etc.

    For example, the real reason why people follow morals is because they were threatened and hurt by another person, they quickly noticed the correlation between doing a particular action and being hurt and learned that if they do said action, they will get hurt, this is called learning to be delusional, because the person inflicting the pain imposing a mental limit, not being aware of the human limits (theoretically speaking; However now I know that that is a learned human being limit refer setting goal post)

    Another example, is the oversimplification of words - such as Dog, Cat, Car, Vehicle, etc.

Me vs. them mentality - 

Propaganda isn't the content being interpreted, it's an interpreting style, and most people victim to it.

Because of pressure (refer state of mind) breeding ignorance mindset for the sake of survival from as deemed as a fact uncomfortable feelings (refer PRO TIP). It is a fact that it's uncomfortable, the way you feel about it is a fact, they are pain receptors in the brain; So don't let anyone ideal variable manipulate you using the methods listen in the section above this one.

The limits of thinking is the limits of your body senses.

The more quick-to-judge you are implies that you are more pressured, therefore are ignorant, to a certain degree (measure) of ignorant (compare this to perfect human being mindset to identify how ignorant), which implies the more your security has been jeopardized.

The more moral-oriented one is, the more judgmental one is; Practicing morals is basically another way of saying I'm judgmental as a limited human being practicing a self-imposed disability, which is a mistake.

    PRO TIP: Whenever scared, first, you must realize that you are judging people because of misplaced feelings and are being indoctrinated.

    PRO TIP: You get emotional because you trust the environment (as we are born trusting the environment, that's how we developing feelings for humans, thru cooperation and human being limits) and it communicates to you by hurling loaded language at your face.

Lesson: Basically, the more judgmental one is of a particular action, an event experienced, (as this is the only way one can gain information, thru human body experiences) one is, the more emotional one is.

    By being aware that you are not much of the universe, you will stop filling that void with ego, rather care to learn the new things, and become more aware about nature by studying ourselves, as we are a part of nature.

Lesson: Being nice is actually being rude, both apply the same logic and are propagandistic in nature.

    PRO TIP: Since we are the end result of a math equation and don't follow any particular formula pattern, study experience experienced from childhood experience, basically study the history you've made.

    PRO TIP: When people say "why" they usually give an idea, not how the idea was formed, this is what you call ideological indoctrination. For example, teaching the content of the bible is an content of variable indoctrination. For example, teaching one to set the goal of chasing money is also a form of ideological indoctrination.

Note: No matter which way people express feelings, they are always expressing their mood. For example, if one says "I'm an anarchist" - they mean I have the anarchist mindset.

Being opinionated is just another form of being sensitive

Applying the flawed thought process formula:

The way you identify it is what makes it create feelings, you are motivated by this formula:

[insert graph]

Caption: In the left-most model, it explains how ignorance leads to motivation, which means ignorance is bliss.


How to solve these flawed thought processes and think according to reality [2]:

Science is just being aware of your own thought process as there is no other way to do so as such.

(what to apply instead)

[apply this in order to identify the flaws in life or be blind to it entirely]

Think according to reality, thought process is a euphemism for using scientific formula (these formulas are learned, that's why it's sometimes hard to reach this conclusion) the way a human being with limited capabilities sees it.

    Thinking according to reality means this: Applying the conservation of mass formula instead of applying the "I know everything and am cocky" formula to identifying reality, acting as such means you did not learn from mistakes. Basically unbiased (aka. learners mindset, since you constantly gain repetition information) mindset being practiced and not one's motivation that stems from a form of fear or pressure.

        This means to think learning from reality, not to learn social constructs from someone else (remember, only two ways: biased and opinionated, or understand human learning process via senses and are unbiased and want to know more) (refer what you think you learn vs. what you actually learn) which require an oversimplification of human behavior, thus creating feelings.

    Using the situation to study it and only it’s event you will identify the specific feelings by deriving said idea how it affects you the formula is how it affects you. Like the law of gravity what it means to humans beings formula is how it affects human beings in specific.

Ackwnodlege what it really means, and why specific feelings are being formed and felt by you by referring to the how human beings work formula and how human beings work simple neuroscience posts, respectively.

The goal of learning via science method: The whole point of learning is to learn via repetition to know what to expect, deriving a formula from the limits of your human biased perception; Not to create a mental limit via mis-categorized feelings and thoughts - these are usually created unintentionally.

What you think you're doing (mental thought process formula applied via fear pressure) vs. what you're actually doing (what information is your body considering/experiencing via this event? [1][2][3]) / delusional vs. reality.

Once you identify real reason and not idealistic you will then turn into a scientist evaluating it unbiasedly.

Science is just studying the specific feelings of your senses and not oversimplifying how you feel (because we need more specific words to describe how we feel)

Set the mindset of knowing what to look for, expect it, that's the whole point of learning science, is to expect and predict.

Deriving formula from studying repetition of events, is merely studying how said events affect you as a human being with 5 senses as limits.

Formulas developed are basically explaining how the situation affects us - as human beings with physical limits, capabilities (measure theoretically speaking)

    Except you don't simplify it into layman's terms, you study how it specifically affects your eyes, nose, body, etc.

Scientific method is a thought process applied to use our sense to identify the specifics of what we feel/sense over time - once we identify said formula, you must have nouns, used as variables to derive the result, an action - that is the true purpose of these parts of speech.

    PRO TIP: Most words are assigned a bigger meaning; If it’s not a scientific word, then it’s a assigned bigger meaning word and it’s therefore can be classed as a loaded word. the feeling felt is the very variable in and of itself, refer how human beings work simple neuroscience.

Classifying events so that you know that you don't know everything. [2] [3] [4]

You have limits and there's the in between. [2]

PRO TIP: To truly understand means to derive the formula yourself via science is a way of thinking formula (identify how you work) and derive answers yourself.

PRO TIP: When interpreting people, don't interpret them as an idea, interpret their behavior and mentally classify them as a state of mind if you can and you are not being attacked being forced to evaluate it via opinionated. This is why scientists stand back when observing explosions, because if they were standing up front, they would learn how it feels to die, not how it feels to observe from a distance.

PRO TIP: All flawed thought process practiced involves some form of information attacking you via human limits experience and experience aging bias because we are constantly aging.

PRO TIP: Verbal language is a barrier in and of itself.

PRO TIP: If you make fun of someone, that implies that you don't care enough to understand why they set their goal for expressing their feelings short-term as such; Moral of the story: don't insult the very test subjects you're supposed to study.

PRO TIP: the word, "opinion" is a social construct as well, opinions are facts, the fact that you are being hurt and are bullying others are a coping mechanism or projecting what you've learned.

PRO TIP: think in terms of "what kind of thought process does practicing these actions require?" theoretically speaking?" [refer situational fallacy, what kind of experiences does it take to think this? it takes pushing motivation]

PRO TIP: If you interpret it right, you will know this is just one event out of the many experiences there are to experience, no one else but you can come across this conclusion.

    If you don’t then you are putting too much effort into one event interpretation this is called focus (This is called direct interpretation form of opinion)

PRO TIP: Emotional intelligence leads you to truth because everything is emotional; Studying science is studying emotions feelings felt by senses.

PRO TIP: When you gain an idea via verbatim you usually merely only think you understand the idea, you do, but you don't understand how said person derived the idea, thus making it propaganda because you don't know the why, rather only a part of the information gained via verbatim (which is a flawed interpreting style too [refer flaw how gain ideal information; this is natures' way of communicating with you]).

* All of these are a form of phycological warfare hidden in plain sight. It's all intentional, never feel bad for giving up. Feel proud and do not feel bad for resisting indoctrination because that's systematically what you're doing - identify the thought process identify that thought, the effort is in the identification of said thought. They are the thought police, they are the


Other helpful notes:

teaching the truth is a contradiction cause what they are actually learning is to be obedient, not to learn for themselves

what you think you're considering vs. what should actually be considered; Use this formula if you have feelings, if you have feelings you are being gaslighted and considering environmental factors.

ask yourself to motivate you "how do you think the first person came across this?"

if it's not planned it's random experience and not learning from is, and if not planning it's bad it creates events for surprise feelings.

measure based on how much focus is put into doing this

focus is a euphemism for cheery-picking directly interpreting, I'm glad i was taught morals cause i learned how to manipulate people my own kids, and learned how to get out of them and learned what they really meant.

Propaganda: Bad curriculum, reactions as surprising feelings. Bad curriculum, if you cannot predict, then it's bad, learning what to learn, learning how to learn, learn is a specials word.

If you know the real, scientific reason why, you can rewire yourself; Like a programmer debugs code on a Robot. I want to study this thought process and identify the flaw with it.

Ask yourself, "how did I reach this conclusion?" Classify the thought using the linguistics ideal system; For example, if the thought is a rhetoric and is "facts don't care about your feelings" you must look how the words "care" "about" is learned, and how they learn to form sentences. I want to unlearn all of these flawed things that I was taught, including the English language, language is a form of communication. Remember though, we learn from repetition.

What type of mindset does it require to work as a Janitor? Clearly not a PHD.

You truly understand when you understand how the thought is derived (for example, antinatalist kid to natalist adult) somethings aren't learned like that like hitting kids is a social construct.

Because you are ignorant and at the state of mind where you aren't in touch with reality variables:

Once unaware of the real reason via pressure (refer mental state limits), they are unable to trace back the real reason because of responsibility (aka. fear-mongered); Therefore successfully brainwashing you, I was here, I know how it feels, I experienced it as a kid.

ask yourself: what is the formula for formulating thoughts?

If you're feeling insecure, just refer writing code on for a Robot.

Comments

Post a Comment

I don't really moderate comments, so do as free as you wish. I intend the comment section to be helpful in some way shape or form though, so please don't abuse this privilege.