[Venting Notes] Anti-Science mindsets/interpretations/perceptions of reality (common forms of inaccurate perceptions of experiences experienced/reality)
Just another word for 'opinion' 'judgmental' -> these words accurately describes the thought process.
Never explicitly ask anyone verbatim "explain your thought process for me" they are indirectly telling it to you via showing you their behavior.
Here I will document the things I experience and state the real, scientific reason why I feel the way I do. Since, all of what I practice on the daily are derived from morals mental limits, I will see how it plays out.
Variables of experience, NOT variables of individua nouns, that is manipulative.
Scientist are Democrats, therefore are the silent majority: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silent_majority
Practicing an anti-science mindset is the same thing as practicing believing in a religion which is the same thing as taking and doing drugs. Proof: https://www.wired.co.uk/article/mormons-experience-religion-like-drug-takers-feel-highs-neuroscientists-say
You should think "out of all limited experiences, why should I gain this virtual piece of information that doesn't have anything to do with explaining the current situation, look at reality." For example, if you're at to a car show, you should go there to look at cars, not go there to (directly) set and develop a plan for office.
Thinking about something other than the situation you're in means you are delusional, this is used as a measurement to feelings.
Other people calling you stupid is proof that they cannot interpret their surroundings accurately, either they are ideally manipulated and they use others word for their thought process (ex, job), or they have been betrayed of trust and morals by being indoctrinated.
We only know what we know, don't oversimplify reality. For example, don't say this isn't going to help you in the long run, let me derive that thought. This is called someone else's biased judgment derived out of survival instinct.
Opinions are basically thought processes that are derived out of a survival instinct. The whole 'moody young person' stereotype is basically just those young people saying "you are ruining me with bigoted judgements."
Understand flawed thought process and evaluate it to stay calm, don't react to it, that's considering propaganda via flawed verbal manipulation.
Communication between people usually goes too fast for people to care to understand and morals.
Forms of communication/sense is the forms of interpretation.
Formula is a thought process, make sure you stay in touch with reality.
Focus is a euphemism for practicing the thought process of cherry-picking facts (in terms of nature, example: individualism) with more emphasis towards said surroundings experienced, motivated by pressure or fear-mongering, this is what makes one narrow-minded.
Either unbiased and creative, or narrow-minded and cherry-picking facts to suit your own mental limits imposed. Conservatism is a self-imposed disability.
Know but you don't care to know more is cockiness and narrow-mindedness.
The people who stay conservatives, like Ben Sharpiro are supposed to be manipulative.
What event/idea are you judging?
Note: I understand the perfection thought process, now I want to understand the flawed thought processes, manipulation.
Know what variables to look for according to human limit must feel calm.
Thought process is the very act of gaining information which is synonymous with experiencing events/ experiences.
We feel lie doing something but fall victim to not doing it because of an experiecne bias.
Critique how you critique things, use criteria, a rubric.
Variables of experience is the very variables of thought processes practiced.
Understanding the playbook of the manipulation of human beings on an induvial level.
Don't feel intimidated, in order to understand reality all you have to do is practice the thought process of classifying variables.
Consider what parts of the senses you feel that you are judging.
Interpreting is basically how you measure the feelings created by the limits of your senses (body). This is the feeling of being aware of the thought process you are practicing, this is to make sure that you don't interpret it ideally, rather to separate thoughts from specific feelings and describe the situation, the environment, this will explain the thought process used. Propaganda is based off of the way you learn things, not the content of said information that is 'learned' (in such a flawed manner).
Thought process formula; People get so caught up in the 'what' the content of said thought process, they barely pay attention to the how it's being learned. This is an example of school brainwashing. If you're confused, which you will be and technically are, if and when you use a non-scientific method thought process, ask yourself, how was this information interpreted, and if you're still confused check out the robot and bathroom sign vision example.
Parenting myself.
Obviously there has to be a limit as to how we got here, since the person is obviously alive and well enough to share his actions, you can conclude that he was neither killed (too hard) or spoiled as a child (too soft), therefore this must imply that there was a medium range communication.
Once you know the limit of all languages and the limits of the variables, you've experienced them all.
You only adopt the same flawed mindset if you don't care to critique it.
It's easy, because it's all within you, all you have to do is stop and look at it. Stop going too fast and oversimplifying it, it's there, you just have to develop care to observe it.
Goal: to identify how parts of your surroundings use linguistics to systematically tell you what to think.
In reality if you wanted to identify how one works, you'd spend time observing it, in the same way you don't ask a tree if it needs any water, it communicates to you via you observing it's states of being.
If you want to evaluate and be creative, evaluate how you communicate with your surroundings, and forget the primary use of verbatim to express it. Remember, feel, not think as technically speaking, all thoughts are stored as feelings. Also there is a lot of specific feelings that are not identified yet solely because people live their lives too fast and oversimplify and not self-reflect in order to realize these facts
Personal Rule: If it's not a pro-science way of thinking mindset, it implies an anti-science mindset is in play. It's your at-birth assigned responsibility to think, no one will tell you this as it directly frees yourself from the mental limits they imposed on you.
Be self-disciplined, it means to be mentally responsible for thoughts and actions.
What are you actually learning? To be obedient, conformist? Or to be a freethinker, an anarchist, and practice freedom of thought?
Jobs are just a fancy way of saying 'interpreting styles' - don't be manipulated by 'ideas' rather be humble and acknowledge the feelings.
Be aware of your practiced thinking style, it's the most important thing practiced in self-reflection.
Here I will list all of the different interpretations of realities, interpreting/evaluation styles: Note that these describe the variable of a state of mind.
Even when interpreting experiences in a flawed manner, know what variables you are considering to explicitly interpret, as they are a part of your sensory limits.
Usually in a flawed manner, you interpret your surroundings (attitude, mirrors) because of peer pressure, thus developing a confirmation bias.
Know what to look for, think in terms of senses and variables, and limits of said senses (limits to death). Expert and predict, don't react by acting some form of being surprised, that's an indication of a fear-mongering thought process that has been practiced in the past (information attacking you) or a flawed way to gain and interpret said information.
Identify the flaws of you being parented (critique parenting style) and move onto to become a scientist.
(that one p. at on spkband that had a semi-ripped woman)
Narrow-minded means to be scared and only consider experience For example, Businesses run off of money and money alone, it's their reality. This is called a direct interpretation of reality via direct experience, this is an example of narrow-mindedness.
Most people don't spend time self-reflecting on feelings, which is why they are scared of themselves, they are scared of their own feelings, they are not "over it."
Once they see something deemed scary at the moment (from practicing direct interpretation), they get scared.
Specific experiences lead to specific people, this is why I prefer security over freedom, freedom isn't something that is to be celebrated at this time in history, the right wingers are the problem and prove to us this over and over again.
verbal communication thought process is meant to manipulate you.
hidden complexity is in the air (24 magic in the air)
Types of interpretations/perceptions/thought process applied to of said experiences:
Note: It should feel much more liberating understanding the thought process practiced, not just blindly developing them out of fear then practicing them, oversimplifying thought process, decreasing creativity, being unaware. This itself is an example of human nature.
- Direct interpretation (these words, as a matter of fact, all words, aka limits, indicate a thought process application, it's up to you to explore the unknown.):
- Explanation: This types of thought process requires 'focus' - a euphemism for looking for the content of certain variables and cherry-picking those facts.
- This type of thought process requires fear-mongering, pressuring to oversimplify, judge and form an opinion-based evaluation towards things. This is how opinions develop.
- Systematically speaking, is the interpretation logic, make sure it's not oversimplified form of communicating with your surroundings.
- Examples:
- Critiquing [Note: This is a mental thought process word] a wrestling match
- Judging a person based off of race (if one get's the chance to) [Note: This can be used to easily manipulate someone based on their mood]
Don't do this: https://estherwilkison.com/slow-down-youre-learning-too-fast/ [learning the wrong thing for the wrong reason]
That is an example of being fear-mongered, cornered into a wall, into thinking certain things.
Ask yourself: What thought process is required in order to feel surprised? [How did you come to that conclusion?] It requires a previous inaccurate interpretation of reality based on morals and trust.
For example, like seeing Ethan at the Kroger.
Curious interpretation
When people debate they don't care to identify the status of one's mental state because they are systematically censored (yes, it's a form of censorship, trying to be creative with the forms of interpretation here; Problem is that many people don't care to exercise brain) from doing as such because they are indoctrinated (from the past events they experienced) to follow morals, which are a form of a mental limit, or are ideally manipulated [I only bow down to human being desire limits, manipulate people].
We care to interpret only the ideas they speak of, which is, by definition, propaganda, all experiences is a form of media, media can be used as a form of propaganda.
Evaluating a particular event you see and only said particular event (in the media) without caring to understand the bigger picture (nature) is a form of propaganda, therefore individualism is a form of propaganda divided by morals (a form of a mental limit). If only we adopted the mindset to help each other instead of divided by morals being against each other thus displacing emotion in society resulting in the need for the death penalty.
We are liberals that are open-minded and collectivist, as it, itself is a part of nature, this is why scientist help people and only help people, not systematically work against each other. Don't evaluate the actions done, evaluate the thought process used to said actions.
"oversimplification of the interpretation of your very own thought process" thought process: This is called being mentally handicapped from seeing reality, examples include, using ideal words, such as words that don't identify feelings, rather ideas 'out there' ex. charger, using
"ideal only" thought process: Only considering ideas from surroundings, not content of variable like a scientist would.
"social construct words:" for example, college, time, etc. These are words that are derived based on the desire to pursue a 'civil' engagement with one another.
remember, your emotions still do play a role in emotions.
If not science thought process, then it's a conspiracy theory and pseudoscience derived hypothesis - it's not about what, it's about how it's derived.
"It's a game" perception - like system of playing a game mindset, this is anti-science and going too fast to acknowledge the facts
"me vs. them" perception -
"ask and respond" perception - (like interacting with a tool to test what it does)
"narrow-mindedness" perception - this is adopted when not caring to question authority.
"think for you" perception/thought process - like watching Prager U videos without the intent of evaluating them as a phycologist, rather to listen the content of the ideas that they convey, if you are doing this make sure to practice the mindset of not adopting same mindset they are imposing.
"think learn, actually learn" - basically answering the question "what do you think you learned vs. what you actually learned shared via verbatim;" For example, you think you learned that, from others' yelling at you that doing what you got yelled for is 'wrong' [see ideal manipulation], when in reality, other people have either been indoctrinated in the same way or just don't like it, as a part of a human limit - not necessarily a part of mental limits, morals, or variable ideal manipulation thought processes, rather mere human nature.
"confused" means to use interpreting logic but your surroundings abused moral limits and are now unaware of what goal to pursue since you're thought process actively considers whatever you lost track of as something that should be cared about. Trust no one because under this freedom, no one is obligated to give you anything, it's the wild, the U.S. is a battlefield.
Only considering the sounds that a person gives out is a flawed interpretation logic, that's only considering the variable of the sounds (from your limits human being POV), and not considering any other variable, it's an example of propaganda interpret, you are not interpreting their behavior rather only a part of their expression accurately*
This is basically, virtually speaking, what home is like; It's imposing a mental limit."oversimplification" perception/thought process -
Note: feelings tell you if you are doing something wrong, it's up to you to interpret it accurately.
Thought process words:
Forgot, Predict, Confused,
perception, thought process are variables.
If it's not a science thought process and free from opinionated bias, then you should critique thought process applied.
opinionated judgmental thought process - this mindset is adopted when indoctrinated with fear to pursue a particular mindset learned via forms of fear - moral verbatim (study linguistics and thought process limits of nature),
If you are a true scientist, you will test limits, even the most pushiest of them all. No, I am a human, I have a comfort zone that I want to stay in, what does this really mean?
* Compare all of these perceptions to how a scientist studies and practices limited thought process by time in a laboratory
An example of ideal manipulation interpreting skills: "Capitalism creates jobs, it also creates the evil of needing a police officer, this should tell you enough about capitalisms’ validity."
Ideas change based off of experience, in order to truly understand this you must understand the circumstances used to derive such an idea. Ideas held are the mental limit, realize all the limits, then you're done with life.
Anything that doesn't spend time realizing and accepting specifies of experience. Money-minded is a euphemism for greed-oriented.
In order to identify how detached from reality ideal system one is, and how far the mood mindset has altered their critical thinking skills, just observe the way they interpret things.
*also list what each mindset is motivated by.
I am doing this now, so that I can chance my neuroscience path, yes I know that I can take phycology classes, but I am a self-learner and I don't want to be lazy, and I don't want to give up that spark of curiosity.
This is an example of a flawed interpretation (mental limits via ideal system); In order to understand this system, you must have adopted an anti-science mindset or are a manipulative physcopath who knows the variables and manipulates his goals bounded only by their willpower.
This will create mental limits.
You'll be asking, why do we even have a word for this (refer list of fake words document)
Comments
Post a Comment
I don't really moderate comments, so do as free as you wish. I intend the comment section to be helpful in some way shape or form though, so please don't abuse this privilege.